Reply to The
New York Times
Connect, They Say, Only
Connect, January 25, 2003 By EMILY EAKIN
By Borut Prah
Connect, only connect... To what? Optical fiber network?
Can I really connect a beam
of light from me to you?
The answer and the problem lies
right in front of
our noses-- the Telegraph Hill. It was a message relay
station.
Here was one of the early hubs of
a network that used
light to carry information.
The problem was not the
speed of transmission,
say, from Fort Point to Telegraph
Hill, but what happened to the
photons after Telegraph Hill
received them. A mirror on Telegraph Hill, if turned exactly
in the right direction towards the
destination would relay
the message instantly. But
since this is hardly possible,
the Telegraph Hill operator wrote
the message down and
relayed it.
Two years ago, before the stocks of Cisco, Nortel,
Lucent, Juniper Networks, Enkindo, JDS Uniphase,
Nanovation, Agilent, Corning, Chorum Technologies,
Calient Networks, Optical Micro Machines, et al., took
the big hit or evaporated altogether, the signal of the
trouble with switching light was well publicized. The
Scientific American January 2001 issue quoted Alastair
M. Glass, director of photonics at Lucent: "It's a crazy
world. Anyone can go out with the dumbest ideas and get
funding for them, and maybe they'll be bought for big
bucks. And they've never made a product". And they
still have not...
The network can routinely shuttle trillions of bits
in a second between hubs. But switching it in the hub,
from a source node to a
destination node is just as difficult
as pointing a mirror on the
Telegraph Hill in the right
direction.
Airlines have discovered this
problem with passenger
traffic in a hub system. A jet
will take you from San Francisco
to Denver hub in three
hours. But you want to go to Atlanta
and the wait in Denver is five
hours. Not only that, you
must walk a good distance to
another gate. Same problem
exists with switching light.
The electrons sent from your PC must become photons
before they can travel over fiber
networks. That is easy. The
problem arises when your photons reach a hub and must be
switched to the specific address
that you want them to reach
among the millions of
addresses. But photons, unlike electrons,
cannot be stored without some very
expensive tricks.
A message carried by light must be
switched by mirrors
instantly, or it is lost.
Billions of dollars have been spent, lost, and even
wasted in the effort to switch information packets with
light. Tiny mirrors must be constructed on microchips
that switch light beams from million of sources to
millions of destinations in millionths of a second. But
this is not an easy matter and it is far from solved.
Thus, interim solutions have been
constructed which
convert photons back to electrons, then store them in
the memory chips, such as you have in your PC, from
where they can be switched back to the right optic fiber
to reach destination. The result is a delay, analogous to
waiting for a connecting
flight. The actual process is
even more complicated since the
internet protocol breaks
up information into packets
that are switched many
times before the message reaches
the destination.
Typically a message travels from a sending node to a
router hub to another router hub
and so on until it
arrives to the recipient
node. Since hubs do not yet switch
with mirrors but with electronics, the phenomenal carrying
capacity of the fiber is only
attainable between hubs.
Only heavy business users have
applications that can justify
hub to
hub links. The millions and millions of internet
users
have little reason
to connect if it takes hours, or maybe
even days to download a movie
through electronic switches.
Until the photonic switches come of
age, over 90% of fiber
optics channels will remain
dark. And so will the prospects
for the return on investment made
into the network trunk lines.
They are all dressed up but
nowhere to go. Yet.
PS July 2003: CORVIS (NASDQ: CORV)
now has the answer.